We will obviously stick to the type 2 hypervisor of each vendor to ensure that we compare apples to apples. Now that we have a better idea of what hypervisors are, let’s introduce the contenders to this comparison. Introduction of the software and licensing This will be the topic of this blog post. Hosted hypervisors have their own management software embedded within the hypervisor. However, this is usually not a problem as type 2 hypervisors are most of the time used for software testing and lab purpose, these should not be used in a production environment. Because of that extra layer of resources, these types of hypervisors have higher latency and offer worse performances than bare metal ones. The hosted hypervisor is a software installed on top of an operating system. They are usually managed with a console (web or third-party software) and widely deployed within enterprise environments. These provide the best level of performance and stability by reducing the underlying resources overhead to a minimum and offering direct access to the hardware. Type 1 hypervisors are operating systems directly installed on the hardware (bare-metal). It can either be a guest software that runs on a bare-metal operating system like Linux, Mac OS, Windows or an OS in itself installed on the hardware. At this point, it is probably unnecessary to describe what virtualization is, however, we will explain the two main ways of running virtual machines.Ī hypervisor, also known as a virtual machine monitor or VMM is the software solution that provides the ability to execute virtual machines on a host. Hypervisors typesīefore getting into the whole VMware vs VirtualBox discussion, it is important to lay down some key concepts about virtualization to understand the scope of this blog. Although there is a clear shift towards cloud and towards containerization to some degree, virtualization is still a mandatory component to run workloads and achieve consolidation. In my opinion workstation does an immensely better job at any kind of graphics processing than player.Virtualization is a wide world that has been around for many years and is still as relevant as it used to be among the IT community and the old VMware vs VirtualBox question is still very much alive. Almost doubles the frame rate of the ASUS laptop. With both of these machine running only running the one VM and another copy of Diablo II, the desktop was able to out-perform the laptop inside of the VM playing Diablo II. Geforce 300 series GPU with 1GB dedicated vRAM Second machine: Asus laptop gaming rig with i7 at 2.2 GHz. Running VMware Workstation - OS XP pro sp3 Player has just a built in software emulator.įor example: I had two different machines i wanted to have two copies of Diablo II on each machine so a roommate and I could have monster strong enough for 5 people and only 2 of us playing local tcp/ip.įirst machine: Desktop Custom Build with Pentium Dual-Core e2200 2.2GHz 2.7 GHz (this cpu does not have the hardware virtualization built in) From what I understood about it (which may be way off base) workstation actually has the ability to port the graphics to and from the GPU. In my experience with messing with the 2 programs, Workstation is much better at handling any kind of gaming graphics than player.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |